Dell XPS Pro200N: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "Recent pickup from a University of Washington (UW) auction. Reading online this unit seems to be equipped with a 200Mhz(!) Pentium Pro processor The amount of RAM has not been directly tested, but according to the part number MT18LD1672G-6X may be 128MB (the max supported by the motherboard) At this time the machine does not (yet) have any uses. The Pentium Pro performs poorly with 16-bit code which makes running Windows 3.1 or 95 on it undesirable Early Linux may a..." |
m Thumbnails unfucked? |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[File:PXL 20250214 033500161.jpg|thumb|alt=XPS Pro 200N (front)|XPS Pro 200N (front)]] | [[File:PXL 20250214 033500161.jpg|thumb|alt=XPS Pro 200N (front)|XPS Pro 200N (front)]] | ||
[[File:PXL 20250214 033516741.jpg|thumb|alt=XPS Pro 200N (rear)| | [[File:PXL 20250214 033516741.jpg|thumb|alt=XPS Pro 200N (rear)|PS Pro 200N (rear)]] | ||
Latest revision as of 11:28, 17 February 2025
Recent pickup from a University of Washington (UW) auction.
Reading online this unit seems to be equipped with a 200Mhz(!) Pentium Pro processor
The amount of RAM has not been directly tested, but according to the part number MT18LD1672G-6X may be 128MB (the max supported by the motherboard)
At this time the machine does not (yet) have any uses. The Pentium Pro performs poorly with 16-bit code which makes running Windows 3.1 or 95 on it undesirable
Early Linux may also be an option for this device as emulation via 86box is difficult
Images of this device also show several (unknown) expansion cards from what ever it was being used for originally. These have been removed after photographing
